Legal Opinion

David Hous. v. U.S. Dep't of Labor

District Court, W.D. Kentucky

Decided March 26, 2018No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 5:16-CV-00113-GNS-LLKPublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGreg N. Stivers, Judge

Plaintiff David Houston ("Houston") brings this action for review of the Department of Labor's ("DOL") denial of his claims under Parts B and E of the Energy Employees Occupational Illness Compensation Program Act of 2000 (the "EEOICPA" or the "Act"), 42 U.S.C. §§ 7384 - 7385s-16. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff's claim is DENIED .

I. BACKGROUND

A. Statutory and Regulatory Background

The EEOICPA provides compensation to individuals who suffer from illnesses as a result of exposure to toxic substances during the course of their work for the Department of Energy ("DOE") and its predecessor…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Motor Vehicle Mfrs. Assn. of United States, Inc. v. State Farm Mut. Automobile Ins. Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. National Ass'n of Home Builders v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. David B. Lowry v. Jo Anne Barnhart, in Her Capacity as Commissioner of the Social Security Administration Dan Hyatt Riley Atkins Bennett EngelmanCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
  4. McDonald Welding and MacHine Company, Inc. v. James H. Webb, Jr., Secretary of the NavyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1987
  5. Patricia Watson v. Secretary of LaborCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Karapondo v. Department of LaborDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API