Legal Opinion

State v. Van De Vorren

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 11, 1989No. L87-123CR; CA A45866PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtGraber, J.

Defendant1 appeals his conviction for first degree theft by deception. ORS 164.015; ORS 164.055; ORS 164.085. He claims that the trial court erred in denying his motion for judgment of acquittal. We affirm.

We recite the facts in the light most favorable to the state. ORS 136.445; State v. Arnold, 90 Or App 596, 599, 752 P2d 1300, rev den 306 Or 661 (1988). In January, 1986, defendant offered to rent a building in Alturas, California, from Mr. and Mrs. Jones, saying that he planned to open a resturant there. He told the Joneses that he had recently sold a restaurant in Belgium for $720,000 and…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. ArnoldCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. State v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API