Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Caldwell v. Citizens Street Railway Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided December 18, 1907No. 15,256PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from tbe district court for Lancaster county: Edward P. Holmes, Judge.

1Opinion of the Court

Dufbte, C.

From tbe information filed by tbe state in this case the following facts appear: Three street railway companies, known as the “Capitol Heights Street Railway Company,” the “Lincoln Rapid Transit Street Railway Company,” and the “North Lincoln Street Railway Company,” were duly organized under the laws of this state, and in the year 1887 ordinances were passed by the city council of the city of Lincoln calling elections for the purpose of *358obtaining the consent of the electors of the city to the construction of lines of street railway in and over the streets of said city. So far as…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Morgan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Heflin v. BinghamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
  3. Wiseman v. EastmanWashington Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Citizens' St. R. v. City of MemphisU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Tennessee · 1893
  5. Sawyer v. WilsonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1873

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. O'Leary v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1912
  2. Ayers v. Citizens Railway Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1908
  3. Lincoln Traction Co. v. City of LincolnNebraska Supreme Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API