Legal Opinion

Schwartz-Gilbert Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided February 9, 1949No. 52871; protests 970198-G and 981682-G (New York)PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

Oliver, Chief Judge:

The merchandise at bar is described on the invoice in one instance as a jam jar and chrome spoon and as a glass sugar pot and chrome spoon on the other invoice. It was assessed with duty as entireties under paragraph 218 (f) of the Tariff Act of 1930 as blown glassware or articles composed in chief value thereof at 60 percent ad valorem. Plaintiff by its protest claims the spoon and the jar and the glass sugar pot and spoon are not entireties but are separately dutiable, the spoon at 40 percent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 339 as a table, household,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Sheldon v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926
  2. Wm. Adams, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Chadwick-Miller Importers, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API