Legal Opinion

Beutel v. Beutel

New York Court of Appeals

Decided February 16, 1982PublishedCited by 74 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed.

Plaintiff’s pleading and the papers submitted in its support cannot be said to set forth a legal basis for finding that defendant procured the separation agreement by duress. As alleged in the complaint, plaintiff was under emotional strain during the several months that the agreement was being drafted. During this entire period, however, plaintiff was represented by an attorney who undertook the actual negotiations. Implicitly, plaintiff’s attorney also approved the terms of the agreement and there is no…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. . RyanNew York Court of Appeals · 1908
  2. Soviero Bros. Contracting Corp. v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1955
  3. Sternlieb v. Normandie National Securities Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Soviero Bros. Contracting v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1957

3Cited by74 opinions

  1. Surlak v. SurlakAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
  2. Morad v. MoradAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Wilson v. NeppellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Golfinopoulos v. GolfinopoulosAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
  5. Stoerchle v. StoerchleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984

69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API