Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Gerald Ross Pizzuto, Jr. v. A.J. Arave, Warden

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 6, 2002No. 97-99017Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partB. Fletcher, Circuit Judge

First, I object to the premature filing of this opinion. The Supreme Court has granted certiorari in Arizona v. Ring, 200 Ariz. 267, 25 P.3d 1139 (2001), to decide whether Apprendi v. New Jersey, 530 U.S. 466, 120 S.Ct. 2348, 147 L.Ed.2d 435 (2000), overrules Walton v. Arizona, 497 U.S. 639, 110 S.Ct. 3047, 111 L.Ed.2d 511 (1990), and requires that a jury, rather than a judge, find the aggravating factors that expose a defendant to death. Because Pizzuto raises the same objection to Idaho’s judge-sentencing scheme, the Supreme Court’s resolution of this issue may be dispositive on the…

2Cases cited66 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Williams v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  4. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  5. Woodson v. North CarolinaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API