Legal Opinion

Sperling v. Hoffman-La Roche Inc.

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided November 30, 1988No. Nos. 88-5104, 88-5214PublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

SLOVITER, Circuit Judge.

I

Introduction

This appeal is before us following the district court’s certification pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1292(b) of its order giving court authorization to plaintiffs in an action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act, 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., to send a notice to those members of the asserted class who have not yet opted in to plaintiffs’ suit. The district court, Judge Harold A. Ackerman, identified the controlling question of law as to which there is substantial ground for difference of opinion as whether, in a case governed by 29…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Coopers & Lybrand v. LivesaySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. Anderson v. Mt. Clemens Pottery Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. v. SperlingSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Brooke Clark v. A&L Homecare &Training Ctr.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2023
  3. James J. Nicholson v. Cpc International Inc., a Corporation, and James R. EisznerCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1989
  4. Bonilla v. Las Vegas Cigar Co.District Court, D. Nevada · 1999
  5. Andrako v. United States Steel Corp.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2011

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API