John J. Cooney and F. Dring Wetherill, Appellees-Cross v. Donald W. Ritter, Appellant-Cross v. Ritter Transportation, Inc., Third Party
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.
In this diversity suit brought in federal court in New Jersey, plaintiffs John J. Coo-ney and F. Dring Wetherill claimed that defendant Donald W. Ritter owed each of them a commission for having arranged to introduce Ritter to the person who purchased Ritter’s business. After a two-day bench trial, the district court found in plaintiffs’ favor with respect to the claimed commissions but concluded that plaintiffs were not entitled to an award of pre-judgment interest. From the judgment awarding plaintiffs the claimed commissions, defendant…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Busik v. LevineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
- Bak-A-Lum Corp. of America v. Alcoa Building Products, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
- Meshinsky v. Nichols Yacht Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
- Ellmex Const. Co., Inc. v. Republic Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
- Wilentz v. HendricksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sachs v. LesserUtah Supreme Court · 2008
- Sachs v. LesserCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- Feit Ex Rel. Feit v. Great-West Life & Annuity InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
- FANTASTIC SAMS FRANCHISE CORP. v. WEEKESDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
- John J. Cooney and F. Dring Wetherill, Appellees-Cross v. Donald W. Ritter, Appellant-Cross v. Ritter Transportation, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.