Legal Opinion

John J. Cooney and F. Dring Wetherill, Appellees-Cross v. Donald W. Ritter, Appellant-Cross v. Ritter Transportation, Inc., Third Party

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided July 26, 1991No. 90-5580, 90-5733PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

LOUIS H. POLLAK, District Judge.

In this diversity suit brought in federal court in New Jersey, plaintiffs John J. Coo-ney and F. Dring Wetherill claimed that defendant Donald W. Ritter owed each of them a commission for having arranged to introduce Ritter to the person who purchased Ritter’s business. After a two-day bench trial, the district court found in plaintiffs’ favor with respect to the claimed commissions but concluded that plaintiffs were not entitled to an award of pre-judgment interest. From the judgment awarding plaintiffs the claimed commissions, defendant…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Busik v. LevineSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1973
  2. Bak-A-Lum Corp. of America v. Alcoa Building Products, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1976
  3. Meshinsky v. Nichols Yacht Sales, Inc.Supreme Court of New Jersey · 1988
  4. Ellmex Const. Co., Inc. v. Republic Ins. Co.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1985
  5. Wilentz v. HendricksonSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1944

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Sachs v. LesserUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Sachs v. LesserCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  3. Feit Ex Rel. Feit v. Great-West Life & Annuity InsuranceDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2006
  4. FANTASTIC SAMS FRANCHISE CORP. v. WEEKESDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2023
  5. John J. Cooney and F. Dring Wetherill, Appellees-Cross v. Donald W. Ritter, Appellant-Cross v. Ritter Transportation, Inc., Third PartyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API