Legal Opinion

The Key City

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided December 18, 1872PublishedCited by 115 opinions

Young shipped a quantity of wheat on the steamboat Key City, a vessel owned by a corporation called the Northwestern Packet Company, which had this and several other steamboats engaged in the navigation of the Upper Mississippi River. The cargo was lost, and so never delivered.

Read the full summary

Young shipped a quantity of wheat on the steamboat Key City, a vessel owned by a corporation called the Northwestern Packet Company, which had this and several other steamboats engaged in the navigation of the Upper Mississippi River. The cargo was lost, and so never delivered. At the time when the shipment was made and the cargo lost on the Key City, there was engaged in the same business in the same waters with the Northwestern Packet Company, a rival corporation known as the La Crosse and Minnesota Steam Packet Company. ' After the. loss of the wheat, these two companies united their stock…

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Miller

The authorities on the subject of lapse of time as a defence to suits for the enforcement of maritime liens are carefully and industriously collected in the briefs of counsel on both sides, to which reference is hereby made without specifying them more particularly.

We think that the following propositions as applicable to the case before us may be fairly stated as the result of these authorities.

1. That while the courts of admiralty are not governed in such cases by any statute of limitation, they adopt the principle that laches or delay in the judicial enforcement of maritime liens…

2Cited by115 opinions

  1. Gardner v. Panama RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  2. Czaplicki v. the Hoegh SilvercloudSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. John W. Farries v. Stanadyne/chicago DivisionCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987
  4. Goodman v. McDonnell Douglas Corp.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1979
  5. Demetrios Larios v. Victory Carriers, Inc., and Alexander S. Onassis Corp., and Boyd, Weir & Sewell, Inc., and Cia, Salaminia De Naviera S.A.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1963

110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API