Legal Opinion

Arison v. Offer

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 10, 1993No. 93-1030PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GUNTHER, Judge.

We reverse the trial court’s order denying Ted Arison’s motion to quash service of process.

In the case at bar, appellee utilized substituted service to effectuate service on Arison pursuant to section 48.161, Florida Statutes (1991). Section 48.161 requires that notice of service on the secretary of state be sent to the nonresident defendant “forthwith.” In Parish Mortgage Corp. v. Davis, 251 So.2d 342 (Fla. 3d DCA), cert. denied, 254 So.2d 789 (Fla.1971), the third district found that a delay of thirty-seven days was not “forthwith.” Here, the notice was sent sixty-eight days…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Parish Mortgage Corporation v. DavisDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1971
  2. SIERRA HOLDING v. Sharp ElectronicsDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arison v. OfferDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1996
  2. John Green Corp. v. CoelloDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1994
  3. Smith v. AlvaradoDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  4. Atria Holdings, S.A. v. Atlantic Funding Capital Corp, et alDistrict Court, M.D. Florida · 2026
  5. Atria Holdings, S.A. v. Atlantic Funding Capital Corp., et al.District Court, M.D. Florida · 2026

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API