Legal Opinion
Harrelson v. Arcadia
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 10, 2011No. 2010 CA 1647PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHigginbotham, J.
|2Robb Harrelson appeals from an amended judgment of the Workers’ Compensation Judge (WCJ) denying Harrel-son’s motion for penalties and attorney fees arising out of his employer’s alleged failure to timely fund the Medicare Set>Aside (MSA) account portion of the parties’ settlement agreement. For the reasons set forth, we affirm the amended judgment. 1
FACTS
On August 24, 2004, Harrelson injured his shoulder while working for Bestaff Arcadia (Bestaff). Harrelson and Bestaff eventually entered into a full and final settlement agreement where Bestaff agreed to pay Harrelson $125,000.00, with…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Dean v. Southmark Const.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
- Trahan v. COCO COLA BOTTLING CO. UNITEDSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2005
- Hampton v. Hampton, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1998
- MacFarlane v. SCHNEIDER NAT. BULK CARRIERSLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
- Hayes v. Louisiana State PenitentiaryLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2007
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Williamson v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2012
- Crockerham v. Weyerhaeuser Holden Wood ProductsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Bourque v. Louisiana Department of Public Safety & CorrectionsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2017
- Ortega v. Cantu Servs., Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Hunter v. Rapides Parish School BoardLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.