Legal Opinion

Rabinovitz v. National Fire Insurance

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided March 3, 1927PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCrosby, J.

These actions are brought to recover upon two fire insurance policies issued to the plaintiff. A fire occurred in the plaintiff’s grocery store on November 17, 1921. The policies each contained the following provision: “This policy shall be void ... if gunpowder or other articles subject to legal restriction shall be kept in quantities or manner different from those allowed or prescribed by law.”

The plaintiff testified that, at the time of the fire, he had in the store fireworks which were in a covered box on a shelf; that they were a part of the stock received by him when he purchased the…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hinckley v. Germania Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1885
  2. Kyte v. Commercial Union Assurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1889
  3. Stone v. Howard InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1891
  4. Johnson v. Union Marine & Fire InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1879
  5. Hill v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Standard Marine Insurance Co. v. PeckSupreme Court of Colorado · 1959
  2. City of Newton v. Reiss Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1954
  3. Strachan v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API