Legal Opinion

Bove v. Croton Falls Construction Co.

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided September 15, 1913PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Motion for a new trial on newly discovered evidence.

1Opinion of the CourtLuce, J.

At the close of the trial the motion to set aside the verdict of the jury in the plaintiff’s favor was entertained, and after the examination of' the able briefs the motion was granted because of an error in the charge1. N. Y. L. J., March 29, 1913. Upon appeal this order was reversed and the verdict reinstated. 81 Misc. Rep. 241. The defendant now moves for a new trial upon newly discovered evidence, consisting of the testimony of two witnesses not sworn upon the trial. There were two interviews between the parties; both agree the first one occurred at the defendant’s Brooklyn office. The…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Keister v. RankinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1898
  2. Bishop v. Kingston Gas & Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1911
  3. Bove v. Croton Falls Construction Co.New York Supreme Court · 1913
  4. Riley v. United States Title Guaranty & Indemnity Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1909

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. La Vetra v. Fraternal Club Sicania, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1926

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API