Legal Opinion

People v. Peetz

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 7, 2004PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Seymour Rotker, J.

By motion dated May 14, 2004, defendant seeks an order of *598the court to obtain a copy of the presentence report pursuant to CPL 390.50 so that he can obtain the information the prison officials are using for: “(i) security classification; (ii) necessity of rehabilitation programs; (iii) eligibility for the rehabilitative programs; and (iv) used by the Parole Board.” Specifically, defendant seeks a copy of the report to “ensure its overall accuracy so that I may endeavor to correct any existing discrepancies or clarify any misinformation’s therein.”

In…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. People v. PeaceNew York Court of Appeals · 1966
  2. Blanche v. PeopleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  3. Shader v. PeopleAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  4. Salahuddin v. MitchellAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1996
  5. Sciaraffo v. New York City Department of ProbationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. People v. PeetzNew York Supreme Court, Queens County · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API