In the Matter of the Hollister Bank

It is insisted by the respondent's counsel that no appeal lies to this court from an order or judgment of a general term, reversing an order of a special term, confirming an apportionment of the debts of an insolvent corporation among the stockholders, pursuant to the act of 1849; either under subdivision 3, section 11 of the Code, because such order is not final; or under section 28, of the act of 1849, because that section only authorizes an appeal from an order confirming such apportionment.

The counsel is perhaps right in the first branch of this proposition. The order appealed from may…