Murray Van & Storage, Inc. v. Murray
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
LETTS, Judge.
This appeal, which under all the circumstances we treat as plenary, stems from a trial judge’s grant of a summary judgment which held, as a matter of law, that a “buy-sell” agreement between stockholders was inferior to a testamentary disposition by a stockholder. We reverse.
The facts involve a point of law hitherto, undecided in Florida although the problem has been addressed in many other jurisdictions. See 61 A.L.R.3d 1090. Simply stated, a majority of the courts have held that any restriction on the alienation of stock is to be strictly construed and testamentary disposition…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Storer v. RipleyNew York Supreme Court · 1958
- Stern v. SternCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
- Taylor's Administrator v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
- Valley National Bank v. ArthurCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
- Bankers Insurance Service Corp. v. Southeastern Home Mortgage Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978
3Cited by3 opinions
- Robert Blechman and Cathy Blechman Chermak v. Estate of Bertram BlechmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
- EVA TITA v. ESTATE OF JOHN P. TITADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
- Robert Blechman and Cathy Blechman Chermak v. Estate of Bertram BlechmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015