Legal Opinion

Murray Van & Storage, Inc. v. Murray

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided November 8, 1978No. Nos. 77-1674 and 77-1675PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LETTS, Judge.

This appeal, which under all the circumstances we treat as plenary, stems from a trial judge’s grant of a summary judgment which held, as a matter of law, that a “buy-sell” agreement between stockholders was inferior to a testamentary disposition by a stockholder. We reverse.

The facts involve a point of law hitherto, undecided in Florida although the problem has been addressed in many other jurisdictions. See 61 A.L.R.3d 1090. Simply stated, a majority of the courts have held that any restriction on the alienation of stock is to be strictly construed and testamentary disposition…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Storer v. RipleyNew York Supreme Court · 1958
  2. Stern v. SternCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1945
  3. Taylor's Administrator v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1957
  4. Valley National Bank v. ArthurCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
  5. Bankers Insurance Service Corp. v. Southeastern Home Mortgage Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1978

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Robert Blechman and Cathy Blechman Chermak v. Estate of Bertram BlechmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015
  2. EVA TITA v. ESTATE OF JOHN P. TITADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2022
  3. Robert Blechman and Cathy Blechman Chermak v. Estate of Bertram BlechmanDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API