Legal Opinion · Dissent

Philadelphia Fraternal Order of Correctional Officers v. Rendell

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 3, 1997Published

1Dissent

KELLEY,

Judge, dissenting.

Because I believe that section 2003 of the *619PERA1 deprives Petitioners of equal protection of the law as guaranteed by Article 1, Sections l2 and 263 of the Pennsylvania Constitution, I would deny the Commonwealth Defendants’ preliminary objection in the nature of a demurrer to Count Two of the Petitioners’ Complaint/Petition, and I would grant the Petitioners’ request for summary relief on this basis. Accordingly, I respectfully dissent.

In outlining the circumstances under which the PERA was enacted by the General Assembly, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court has noted:

Prio…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Pennsylvania Labor Relations Board v. State College Area School DistrictSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Employes v. Pennsylvania Labor Relations BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API