Legal Opinion

Hay v. Newton County

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided May 24, 2005No. A05A0160PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Per curiam

Samuel M. Hay III, pro se, appeals the trial court’s order validating the Newton County Water Revenue Bonds, Series 2004. He raises 14 enumerations of error, none of which is meritorious. Thus, we affirm the trial court’s order validating the bonds issued on behalf of Newton County, Newton County Water and Sewerage Authority, the City of Covington, and the Walton County Water and Sewerage Authority.

Hay’s brief includes no statement of facts or proceedings, and utterly fails to cite to the record to support his numerous factual allegations. This presentation violates Court of Appeals Rule 25…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Rich v. State of Ga.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  2. Copeland v. StateSupreme Court of Georgia · 1997
  3. Bennett v. MoodyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  4. Crouch v. Federated Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2002
  5. Hay v. Newton CountyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Luong v. TranCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  2. Patterson v. LopezCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  3. Berry v. City of East PointCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2006
  4. Greene County Development Authority v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015
  5. Greene County Development Authority v. State of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API