Legal Opinion

Castagnetto v. Superior Court

California Supreme Court

Decided October 6, 1922No. S. F. No. 10413PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT

Conceding without deciding the question of the jurisdiction of this court to entertain the application herein for a writ of review, we are satisfied that the petition should be denied.

The sole contention of the petitioner is that in counting the ballots in a contest pending before it, following the recent primary election, the superior court has illegally counted certain ballots not stamped, but marked with a pencil cross, by reason of which the result of the primary election as declared by the board of supervisors of the county has been changed, and the petitioner has been deprived…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Sweetser v. PachecoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1916

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Livingston v. HeydonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  2. Morrison v. WhiteCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1935
  3. Pleasant Grove Union School District v. AlgeoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1923
  4. McFarland v. SpenglerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Warren v. WilsonNevada Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API