Legal Opinion

Azael Dythian Perales v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided October 23, 2018No. 787-18WUnpublished

1Opinion of the Court

T.C. Memo. 2018-177

UNITED STATES TAX COURT AZAEL DYTHIAN PERALES, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, Respondent Docket No. 787-18W. Filed October 23, 2018. Azael Dythian Perales, pro se. Kimberly A. Daigle and John T. Arthur, for respondent. MEMORANDUM OPINION LAUBER, Judge: This whistleblower award case is before the Court on a motion for summary judgment filed by the Internal Revenue Service (IRS or re- spondent). Respondent contends that he is entitled to judgment as a matter of law because the IRS Whistleblower Office (Office) did not initiate any administrative or judicial…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sundstrand Corporation v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
  2. Sundstrand Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1992
  3. Florida Peach Corp. v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1988
  4. Murphy v. Commissioner of IRSCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2006
  5. Murphy v. Comm'rUnited States Tax Court · 2005

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API