Legal Opinion

Rhodes v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 29, 1986No. CR 86-12PublishedCited by 19 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

We must reverse this capital felony murder conviction because of the equivocation of a juror, upon being polled, as to his verdict. We will discuss the appellant’s other points only to the extent it is necessary to avoid error if the case is retried.

1. The undecided juror

At the conclusion of the trial, the appellant’s counsel asked that the jurors be polled as to their verdict of guilty. When the court inquired of juror Washington, the following occurred:

Court: Mr. Washington, is this your verdict?

Mr. Washington: It is, with a question.

Court: Sir?

Mr. Washington: It is,…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Roberts v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Robert Earl Williams v. United States of America, Gerald Coleman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  3. Andrews v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  4. Tarry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  5. United States v. Charles W. SextonCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by19 opinions

  1. Ricarte v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  2. Atkinson v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  3. Adams v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2013
  4. Sanders v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  5. Hill v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1990

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API