Legal Opinion

Oka v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 29, 1925PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Martin, J.:

This action on an accident and health policy issued by defendant to plaintiff was brought because of defendant’s failure to pay plaintiff the stated weekly indemnity against total disability. The policy contains the following:

“ Schedule II. Or, if ' such injury ’ shall not result in any of the losses mentioned above, but shall independently and exclusively of all other causes, continuously and wholly disable and prevent the Insured from the date of accident, from performing any and every kind of duty pertaining to his occupation, the Company will pay him the weekly indemnity above…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Nugent v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1899

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Mohawk Carpet Mills, Inc. v. StateNew York Court of Claims · 1940
  2. Cone Mills Corp. v. BeckerNew York Supreme Court · 1971
  3. M. Schottenfeld & Sons, Inc. v. KasabaliAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1956

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API