In re Daniel H.

[¶ 1] The parents of Daniel H. appeal from a judgment entered in the District Court (Rumford, Carlson, J.) terminating their parental rights due to persistent concerns about Daniel’s basic health and safety, the parents’ inability to understand and respond to his needs, their history, of substance abuse, the mother’s serious intellectual limitations, and the father’s violence toward the mother and others. We affirm the judgment.

I. BACKGROUND

[¶ 2] The following facts are drawn from the court’s findings of fact, reached by clear and convincing evidence, all of which are supported by competent…