Legal Opinion

Eising v. Young

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 15, 1902PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Motion for a preference.

1Opinion of the CourtGildersleeve, J.

The plaintiff moves for a preference, under section 791, subdivision 11, of the Code, on the ground that the action is for libel. The moving party relies wholly and solely upon this fact in making the application for a preference. In this county, civil actions, specified in section 791 of the Code, are not entitled, as a matter of right, to be advanced over causes noticed for trial for prior terms. The right to grant a preference over issues noticed for trial for prior Trial Terms rests in the discretion of the court; but some fact, other than that the action is one specified in section 791…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Morse v. Press Publishing Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1902

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Carroll v. Pennsylvania Steel Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1904
  2. Cohen v. Interurban St. Ry. Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904
  3. Gehrt v. DeaneCity of New York Municipal Court · 1908
  4. Jackson v. JacksonNew York Supreme Court · 1904
  5. Peck v. MaherCity of New York Municipal Court · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API