Legal Opinion

In re the Estate of Ash

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 23, 2013PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*1288OPINION BY

COLVILLE, J:

This case is an appeal by Joseph Heit, a beneficiary under the will of Ray Ash. We quash this matter.

Ray Ash died testate. His will made several specific cash bequests. It also directed that Ash’s remaining personal and real property be sold with the proceeds being divided among three residual beneficiaries — namely, Appellant, James Heit (Appellant’s brother) and Duane Fetter. The will devised no realty. Appellant was named as executor.

By deed dated November 4, 2010, Appellant, as executor, conveyed to himself, as an individual, a certain tract of land (“Tract 1”)…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Estate of StrickerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
  2. In Re Estate of AllenSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2008

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Estate of Virginia Cherry Appeal of: Ronald LockeSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
  2. In Re:Estate of Krasinski, S. Appeal of:KrasinskiSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  3. In re Estate of KrasinskiSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
  4. In Re: Estate of Krasinski, S. Apl of: DunzikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
  5. In Re: Estate of Krasinski, S. Apl of: DunzikSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API