United States v. Fair
District Court, N.D. California
Criminal prosecution by the United States against John Fair and others. On motion by defendants for order requiring reporter to make transcript.
1Opinion of the Court
DOOLING, District Judge.
The defendant, having been convicted of using the mails in furtherance of a scheme to defraud, now moves the court for an order “directing the reporter in this court to transcribe the testimony heretofore taken upon the trial of the above-entitled cause, at the expense of the government.” The motion is based, upon the affidavits of defendant and his counsel, on the ground that defendant is in indigent circumstances, and because of his poverty cannot pay for such transcript or give security for the same, and such transcript is absolutely necessary to perfect the record…
2Cited by5 opinions
- State v. LorenzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1951
- United States ex rel. Estabrook v. OtisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1927
- Cheek v. ThompsonDistrict Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1940
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Griffin v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1956