Legal Opinion · Dissent

Senogles v. Carlson

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided September 27, 2017No. A15-2039Published

1Dissent

DISSENT

ANDERSON, Justice

'(dissenting).

This case involves an almost 5-year-old child who nearly drowned in a tragic accident. But not all tragic accidents are com-pensable in litigation. Here, the court unearths a factual dispute where none exist to conclude that a jury could find that the landowner should have anticipated this injury and, therefore, the landowner had a duty to protect the child from the Mississippi River. By so holding, the court opens the door to a significant, and unwarranted, expansion of social host liability. -

It is unnecessary for a jury to decide this case because the…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  2. Peterson v. BalachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  3. Domagala v. RollandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
  4. Larson v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
  5. Johnson v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API