Senogles v. Carlson
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Dissent
DISSENT
ANDERSON, Justice
'(dissenting).
This case involves an almost 5-year-old child who nearly drowned in a tragic accident. But not all tragic accidents are com-pensable in litigation. Here, the court unearths a factual dispute where none exist to conclude that a jury could find that the landowner should have anticipated this injury and, therefore, the landowner had a duty to protect the child from the Mississippi River. By so holding, the court opens the door to a significant, and unwarranted, expansion of social host liability. -
It is unnecessary for a jury to decide this case because the…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- DLH, Inc. v. RussSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
- Peterson v. BalachSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
- Domagala v. RollandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2011
- Larson v. LarsonSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1985
- Johnson v. Washington CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1994
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.