Kinart v. Seabury Co.
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Harrison District Court. — Earl Peters, Judge. Aotion upon an account. Verdict for plaintiff. The court suspended the entry of judgment on the verdict, and.plaintiff appeals. —
1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.
1. Appeal and error: harmless order* ■working' correct results. This case present a somewhat anomalous situation. The defendant Frank Seabury, doing business under the name of the Seabury Company, having a contract with the board of supervisors of Harrison County for the construction of some part of a drainage ímprovement, employed the plaintiff to perform services £ i • . , ™ . for him upon such improvement. Services were *938rendered to the amount of $331, wbicb the company refused to pay; whereupon plaintiff filed a statement of Ms account with the county auditor of Harrison County, praying…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Grain v. AldrichCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- James v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1886
- Rivers v. Wright & Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1903
- Peugh v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
- Searles v. Northwestern Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1910
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Equitable Life Insurance v. RoodSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928
- Wilkinson v. Queal Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1929