Legal Opinion

Appel v. Boston National Title Agency, LLC

District Court, S.D. California

Decided August 15, 2022No. 3:18-cv-00873Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 HOWARD APPEL, et al., Case No.: 3:18-CV-0873-RSH-AHG 12 Plaintiffs, ORDER DENYING MOTION TO 13 v. STRIKE ANSWER TO AMENDED COMPLAINT 14 BOSTON NATIONAL TITLE AGENCY, LLC, 15 [ECF No. 112] Defendant. 16 17 18 On July 15, 2020, Plaintiffs filed a motion to strike portions of Defendant Boston 19 National Title Agency, LLC’s (“Boston National’s”) Answer to Plaintiffs’ Third Amended 20 Complaint (“TAC”). ECF No. 112. The motion is directed to seven specific statements in 21 Boston National’s Answer, in each of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Whittlestone, Inc. v. Handi-Craft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  2. Fantasy, Inc. v. FogertyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
  3. Neveu v. City of FresnoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2005
  4. San Diego Unified Port Dist. v. Monsanto Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API