Legal Opinion

Hogan v. Wolf

New York Supreme Court

Decided June 15, 1890PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Hearing of plaintiff’s exceptions at General Term. Catherine A. Hogan brought this action against Caroline Wolf, for damages for' enticement of the plaintiff’s husband. Upon defendant’s motion, the complaint was dismissed on the pleadings, and the plaintiff’s exception thereto was ordered to be heard in the first instance at the general term. Further material facts appear in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtVan Brunt, P. J.

This action was brought to recover damages because of the enticement of the *2plaintiff’s husband from her in the year 1858, and the depriving the plaintiff of his comfort and society and assistance from that time until the time of his death, which occurred in 1885, twenty-seven years after said alleged enticement. Among other defenses the defendant set up the six-years’ statute of limitation. Upon the opening of the plaintiff’s case the counsel for the defendant moved to dismiss the complaint on the pleadings, which motion was granted, and exception duly taken, which was ordered to be heard in…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Secor v. . SturgisNew York Court of Appeals · 1858
  2. Houston Water Works v. KennedyTexas Supreme Court · 1888
  3. City of North Vernon v. VoeglerIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  4. Troup v. Executors of SmithNew York Supreme Court · 1822
  5. Bank of Hartford County v. WatermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Perry v. Erie Transfer Co.New York Court of Common Pleas · 1892

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API