Legal Opinion

Harnwell v. Hollenberg Music Co.

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 1, 1928PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Kirby, J.,

(after stating the facts). This court on a motion for rehearing has concluded it should be sustained, and appellant’s contention that the trial court erred in refusing to quash the summons and to dismiss the cause as against her for want of jurisdiction upheld. The motion to make her a party was made upon the disclosure by the answer of C. P. Harnwell and Mary Bryan that the property belonged to her, and she was duly served with a summons, and no- error was committed in not granting the motion on that account; but the value of the property replevied was shown by the undisputed…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ware v. Shoemaker-Bale Auto Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1928

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bynum v. Patty and Devilbiss v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  2. Hill v. BushSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API