Johnson v. Industrial Commission
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
STEVENS, Judge.
The issues concern the factual determination that the petitioner was a domestic in-servant and excluded from coverage by the policy held by the respondent employer.
A. A. Fearn and J. A. Fearn are father and son. For convenience, they will be referred to as Fearn, Sr. and Fearn, Jr. respectively. Prior to the retirement of Fearn, Sr., he and his son were partners in a small family enterprise raising cattle and cotton. They elected to be insured with The Industrial Commission of Arizona as authorized by A.R.S. Section 23-902. The policy contained the following heading designating…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Nickerson v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1966
3Cited by3 opinions
- Griebel v. Industrial Com'n of ArizonaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1982
- Sullivan v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
- Torres v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969