California Department of Water Resources v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
TASHIMA, Circuit Judge:
The California Department of Water Resources (“DWR”) petitions for review of a Federal Energy Regulatory Commission (“FERC”) order permitting intervenor Pacific Gas and Electric Company (“PG & E”) to include in its tariff for use of PG & E power transmission lines charges for $132 million worth of various facilities previously classified as generation tie lines and generation step-up transformers (“GSUs”). 1 PG & E, a utility which owns the high-voltage electricity transmission lines in California, is required to allow anyone to transmit power over these lines.…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Yueh-Shaio YangSupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- New York v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Midwest Iso Transmission Owners v. Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, Public Service Commission of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
- Public Utilities Commission v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Public Utility District No. 1 v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Karuk Tribe v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- California Trout v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- Montana Consumer Counsel v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- Fall River Rural Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Federal Energy Regulatory CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
- Karuk Tribe v. United States Forest ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.