Gary Stewart Boardman v. Wayne Estelle, Warden
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
*1524TROTT, Circuit Judge:
The most persuasive counsel may not be able to speak for a defendant as the defendant might, with halting eloquence, speak for himself.
Green v. United States, 365 U.S. 301, 304, 81 S.Ct. 653, 655, 5 L.Ed.2d 670 (1961) (Frankfurter, J., writing for the plurality).
Gary Boardman asserts he was denied due process of law because the state trial court refused to allow him to speak at his sentencing hearing after he affirmatively requested to do so. We agree that due process requires criminal defendants be permitted to allocute before sentencing if they so request, and we remand…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Faretta v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Hill v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- Adams v. United States Ex Rel. McCannSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
- Joint Anti-Fascist Refugee Committee v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1951
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by115 opinions
- State v. StephensonTennessee Supreme Court · 1994
- Theodore J. Lyons v. Clarice StovallCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
- Tony Duckett v. Salvador Godinez Brian McKayCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- United States v. BarrettCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1999
- Harvey Lee Green, Jr. v. James B. French, Warden, Central PrisonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1998
110 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.