PRESCOTT v. OKLAHOMA CAPITOL PRESERVATION COMMISSION

T1 I fully join in the order denying rehearing in this case and in Justice Taylor's concurring opinion, but write separately to emphasize a few additional points, In his Petition for Rehearing, the Attorney General reargues issues previously presented and already fully considered by this Court, No grounds exist for rehearing this case. See Tomahawk Res., Inc. v. Craven, 2005 OK 82, ¶ 1, 130 P.3d 222, 225-26 (Okla.2005).

T 2 Despite the fact that this Court decided the case solely on the basis of Art, II, § 5 of the Oklahoma Constitution,1 on rehearing, the Attorney General continues to rely on…