Legal Opinion

MR F v. MSAD 35

District Court, D. Maine

Decided May 21, 2021No. 2:20-cv-00220Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF MAINE MR. F. et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Docket No. 2:20-cv-00220-NT ) MSAD #35, ) ) Defendant. ) ORDER ON PLAINTIFFS’ IDEA APPEAL Plaintiffs Mr. F. (“Father”) and Ms. H. (“Mother”) (collectively, the “Parents”) are the parents of A.F., a school-age child with a disability. The Defendant is Maine School Administrative District #35 (the “District”), which was the local educational agency responsible for making a free appropriate public education (“FAPE”) available to A.F. under the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (the “IDEA”), 20 U.S.C.…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Schaffer Ex Rel. Schaffer v. WeastSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
  2. Fry v. Napoleon Community SchoolsSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  3. Forest Grove School District v. T. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
  4. D.B. Ex Rel. Elizabeth B. v. EspositoCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2012
  5. Daniel Lenn, Etc. v. Portland School CommitteeCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1993

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API