Legal Opinion

Dyer v. Keith

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided October 8, 1932No. 30,728PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hutchison, J.:

The serious and difficult question involved in this appeal is whether the different items of the question submitted to the jury as to the amount of damages allowed for apparently different reasons overlapped each other and thus duplicated the allowance made.

The general verdict was for $8,000 for damages sustained by the plaintiff on account of injuries received in an automobile collision. The one special question asked the jury and the itemized answers given to it were as follows:

“Q. If you find for the plaintiff, state how much you allow…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Doty v. Crystal Ice & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1927
  2. MacElree v. WolfersbergerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1898
  3. Jones ex rel. Jones v. Southwestern Interurban Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1914
  4. Madison v. Kansas City, Mexico & Orient Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1913
  5. St. Louis & San Francisco Railway Co. v. BrickerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1902

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Henderson v. DeckertSupreme Court of Kansas · 1945
  2. Shirley v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1997
  3. Claggett v. Phillips Petroleum Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1939
  4. McKinley-Winter Livestock Commission Co. v. FletcherSupreme Court of Kansas · 1959
  5. Shirley v. SmithCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API