Legal Opinion

Ferreira v. P.C.H. Inc.

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1989No. 19411PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

2Per curiam

This is an appeal from a summary judgment. Appellant Lorie Ferreira rented an automobile from respondent P.C.H., Inc., a Nevada corporation doing business as Rent-a-vette. While being driven by an unauthorized driver, the automobile was involved in a one-car accident. Rent-a-vette sued Lorie and her husband Carlo Ferreira. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of Rent-a-vette against both Lorie and Carlo in the amount of $11,068.31 plus attorney’s fees, costs and interests.

Summary judgment is appropriate only when no genuine issue of fact remains for trial and one party…

3Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Old Aztec Mine, Inc. v. BrownNevada Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Bader v. CerriNevada Supreme Court · 1980
  3. Wantz v. RedfieldNevada Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Pacific Pools Construction Co. v. McClain's Concrete, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Clauson v. LloydNevada Supreme Court · 1987

4Cited by9 opinions

  1. Nga 2 Limited Liability Co. v. RainsNevada Supreme Court · 1997
  2. G.K. Las Vegas Ltd. Partnership v. Simon Property Group, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2006
  3. Mark Properties, Inc. v. National Title Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2001
  4. G.K. Las Vegas Ltd. Partnership v. Simon Property Group, Inc.District Court, D. Nevada · 2006
  5. Mark Properties, Inc. v. National Title Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API