Legal Opinion · Dissent

Vernon Park Realty, Inc. v. City of Mount Vernon

New York Court of Appeals

Decided July 14, 1954Published

1DissentFuld, J.

I cannot agree that the zoning ordinance of the City of Mount Vernon here under attack is unconstitutional.

A zoning ordinance is confiscatory and, hence, unconstitutional only when it “ so restricts the use of property that it cannot be used for any reasonable purpose ” (Arverne Bay Constr. Co. v. Thatcher, 278 N. Y. 222, 232) or when it restricts it “ to a use for which the property is not adapted ”. (Dowsey v. Village of Kensington, 257 N. Y. 221, 231.) But, if “ the validity of the legislative classification for zoning purposes be fairly debatable, the legislative judgment must be allowed…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
  2. Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
  3. Rodgers v. Village of TarrytownNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
  4. Matter of Wulfsohn v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
  5. Dowsey v. Village of KensingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API