Vernon Park Realty, Inc. v. City of Mount Vernon
New York Court of Appeals
1DissentFuld, J.
I cannot agree that the zoning ordinance of the City of Mount Vernon here under attack is unconstitutional.
A zoning ordinance is confiscatory and, hence, unconstitutional only when it “ so restricts the use of property that it cannot be used for any reasonable purpose ” (Arverne Bay Constr. Co. v. Thatcher, 278 N. Y. 222, 232) or when it restricts it “ to a use for which the property is not adapted ”. (Dowsey v. Village of Kensington, 257 N. Y. 221, 231.) But, if “ the validity of the legislative classification for zoning purposes be fairly debatable, the legislative judgment must be allowed…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Village of Euclid v. Ambler Realty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Arverne Bay Construction Co. v. ThatcherNew York Court of Appeals · 1938
- Rodgers v. Village of TarrytownNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Matter of Wulfsohn v. BurdenNew York Court of Appeals · 1925
- Dowsey v. Village of KensingtonNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.