Legal Opinion

Muchliki v. Woefel

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 26, 1922No. 23,840PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtEwbank, C. J.

Appellee, as plaintiff, sued appellant, as defendant, and recovered a judgment “that the bonds of matrimony heretofore existing between plaintiff and defendant be, and the same are hereby dissolved, and the plaintiff be, .and she is hereby granted a divorce from the defendant, on the grounds set forth in her complaint. It is further considered and adjudged by the court that the plaintiff recover of and from the defendant the sum of $350.00 as attorney’s fees herein * * * and she is hereby permitted to resume her former name of Pelagia Woefel.”

Forty days later, at a subsequent term, an…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ketchum v. . EdwardsNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
  2. Perry v. PernetIndiana Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Hilker v. HilkerIndiana Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Privett v. PressleyIndiana Supreme Court · 1878
  5. Thistlethwaite v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1898

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Wellington v. WellingtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1973
  2. Hays v. HaysIndiana Supreme Court · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API