Legal Opinion

Larson v. Downing

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 2006No. 05-0155PublishedCited by 154 opinions

1Per curiam

In determining whether a person is qualified by training and experience to testify as an expert in a case involving a health care liability claim, the court is required by statute to consider, among other things, “whether, at the time the claim arose or at the time the testimony is given, the witness ... is actively practicing medicine in rendering medical care services relevant to the claim.” 1 The trial court in this medical malpractice case excluded the plaintiffs expert because it had been fifteen years since he had performed surgery like that performed by the defendant. A divided court…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. EI Du Pont De Nemours & Co. v. RobinsonTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Broders v. HeiseTexas Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Downing v. Mark D. Larson, M.D., P.A., Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2004

3Cited by154 opinions

  1. Leslie Coleman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
  2. Baty v. Olga Futrell, Crna, & Complete Anesthesia Care, P.C.Texas Supreme Court · 2018
  3. Baylor University Medical Center v. Biggs, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2007
  4. Baylor College of Medicine v. Pokluda, Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)2009
  5. Bakhtari v. Estate of Dumas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)2010

149 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API