In re Sedor
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Respondent was admitted to the practice of law by this Court *104on July 13, 1994, and maintained an office for the practice of law in Rochester. The Grievance Committee filed a petition charging respondent with acts of professional misconduct. Respondent filed an answer denying material allegations of the petition, and a Referee was appointed to conduct a hearing. Certain issues of fact were resolved by stipulation and the hearing was conducted with respect to outstanding issues of fact. The Referee filed a report that the Grievance Committee moves to confirm in part and…
3Cited by1 opinion
- Matter of SedorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019