Legal Opinion
Amado v. Estrich
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided April 24, 1992PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order insofar as appealed from unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed with costs to plaintiffs in accordance with the following Memorandum: Plaintiffs brought this action to recover for injuries sustained by Anthony J. Amado when defendants’ dog allegedly knocked him from his bicycle. At the time, defendants’ *1110dog was running unattended and unleashed in violation of the Town of Penfield Leash Law. In response to plaintiffs’ CPLR 3101 demand for photographs of all dogs "kept or harbored” or "owned” by defendants, their counsel provided six photographs one day before the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Walker v. SheldonNew York Court of Appeals · 1961
- Smith v. Hooker Chemicals & Plastics Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Wheaton v. GuthrieAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Jones v. Hospital for Joint Diseases & Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Wilk v. MuthNew York Supreme Court · 1987
3Cited by10 opinions
- John Paul Mitchell Systems v. Quality King Distributors, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2000
- Sorel v. IacobucciAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Clo v. McDermottAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Petrone v. FernandezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Nardi v. GonzalezYonkers City Court · 1995
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.