Legal Opinion
Triple Cities Construction Co. v. Maryland Casualty Co.
New York Court of Appeals
Decided June 25, 1958PublishedCited by 25 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFuld, J.
The plaintiff, maintaining that defendant Maryland Casualty Company had lulled it into inactivity to induce it to continue settlement negotiations until its lien had expired, *446asserted an estoppel against the defendant. The jury returned a verdict for the plaintiff, but the Appellate Division reversed the judgment and dismissed the complaint. We are called upon simply to determine whether sufficient evidence was presented to justify a finding of estoppel.
Dan-Bar Contracting Co., Inc., had an agreement, as general contractor, with the State of New York for the construction of certain public…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Metropolitan Life Ins. Co. v. . Childs Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1921
- Lynn v. LynnNew York Court of Appeals · 1951
- Stein v. PalisiNew York Court of Appeals · 1955
- Romano v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1936
- Triple Cities Construction Co. v. Dan-Bar Contracting Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1954
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by25 opinions
- City of Yonkers v. Otis Elevator Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988
- Anaconda-Ericsson, Inc. v. Hessen (In Re Teltronics Services, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1983
- Christian Dior-New York, Inc. v. Koret, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1986
- Porter v. Butte Farmers Mutual Insurance CompanyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1961
- New York State Energy Research & Development Authority v. Nuclear Fuel Services, Inc.District Court, W.D. New York · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.