Legal Opinion

Washington Trust Co. v. Norwich & Westerly Traction Co.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 26, 1915PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Suit to foreclose a judgment lien, brought to and tried by the Superior Court in New London County, Reed, J.; facts found and judgment rendered for the defendants, from which the plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtBeach, J.

On April 3d, 1906, the Norwich and Westerly Railway Company mortgaged all of its property, including the land in question, to the then State Treasurer and his successors in office, to secure an issue of bonds amounting to $750,000.

This mortgage was not recorded in the office of the Secretary of State, as required by § 2 of chapter 149 of the Public Acts of 1905 (p. 357), until November 22d, 1909. In the meantime, on February 16th, 1909, the plaintiff brought an action against the Railway Company as indorser on a promissory note for $9,000, and attached the land. The judgment lien sought to be…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Ensign v. BattersonSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1896
  2. Goodman v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1857
  3. Waterman v. BuckinghamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1906
  4. Loomis v. KnoxSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1891
  5. Colwell v. WarnerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1869

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2006
  2. Savings Bank of Danbury v. DownsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1901
  3. P. H. & F. M. Roots Co. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1927
  4. Anthony v. AlmorthConnecticut Superior Court · 1935
  5. Young v. Armetta, No. Cv 96-0079270 S (May 20, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API