Willis v. Dun
Ohio Supreme Court
Certiorari. It was claimed that pending a controversy among the heirs of Robert Willis, the Common Pleas appointed Dun ad*ministrator. Dun was not of kin, and not entitled to ad- [131 ministration. After the controversy was ended, application was made to rescind the appointment of Dun, and call in the letters of administration, which application was overruled. To reverse that overruling order this certiorari is brought.
1Opinion of the Court
BY THE COURT.
There is nothing on this record but the motion to rescind, and the order of the court overruling it. The grounds of the motion, or order, or appointment of the adminstrator, is nowhere disclosed. As there is nothing for the court to act upon, the writ is quashed.
2Cited by8 opinions
- Pittsburgh, Allegheny & Manchester Passenger Railway Co. v. McCurdySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- Cochran v. ArnoldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1868
- Meason v. KaineSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1871
- Musser v. GardnerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
- Beringer v. Meanor's AdministratorSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1877
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.