Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Sundance v. Municipal Court

California Supreme Court

Decided December 31, 1986No. L.A. 31785Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

BIRD, C. J., Concurring and Dissenting.

Although I concur with much of the discussion in the lead opinion, I write separately to stress the inherent limitations of such a solution. Despite its recognition that criminal processing of public inebriates is dehabilitative, dehumanizing and wholly ineffective, the court fails to order relief to remedy the widespread constitutional violations that permeate the present system.

Every day, individuals are rounded up and crowded into unsanitary facilities, forced to experience the dangerous initial stages of withdrawal with little or no medical…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Estelle v. GambleSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Addington v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  3. Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Jackson v. IndianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. O'Connor v. DonaldsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1975

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API