Legal Opinion

LeDoux v. Alert Transfer & Storage Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided September 1, 1927No. 20509. Department OnePublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFullerton, J.

The appellant LeDoux was the companion of Millspaugh, mentioned as such in the case of Millspaugh v. Alert Transfer & Storage Co., ante p. 111, 259 Pac. 22. His action is to recover damages suffered in the accident therein described. It was tried jointly with that case, and, like it, was dismissed with prejudice. His case differs from the cited case only in the circumstance that he was riding on the motorcycle with Millspaugh, at the invitation of Millspaugh, and was not the operator of the motorcycle. His contention for reversal is that he is entitled to recover, even though, the accident…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Millspaugh v. Alert Transfer & Storage Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1927

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Haaga v. Saginaw Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Allen v. PorterWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Haaga v. Saginaw Logging Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. Meath v. Northern Pacific Railway Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. White v. CochraneSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API