Legal Opinion

Svienty v. Whirlpool Corp.

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided July 7, 2005No. 1:04-cr-00067PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

QUIST, District Judge.

Plaintiff, Judith Svienty (“Svienty”), has sued Defendant, Whirlpool Corporation (“Whirlpool”), alleging that Whirlpool violated the Family and Medical Leave Act of 1993 (“FMLA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 2601 to 2654. Now before the Court is Whirlpool’s motion for summary judgment. For the reasons set forth below, the Court will grant the motion and dismiss Svienty’s complaint with prejudice.

I. Facts

Svienty was employed full-time by Whirlpool at its Benton Harbor, Michigan, division from April 1988 until December 12, 2003. Svienty was a computer operator, and her most recent…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. St. Mary's Honor Center v. HicksSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Linda M. Kocsis v. Multi-Care Management, Inc., D/B/A Bath Manor Special Care CentreCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. Salazar-MonteroDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 2007
  2. Rosado-Mangual v. Xerox CorporationDistrict Court, D. Puerto Rico · 2019

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API