Legal Opinion

Bonneau v. Russell

Supreme Court of Vermont

Decided January 9, 1952No. 361PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBlackmer, J.

This action is in contract for breach of implied warranty of title. Trial was by jury, and resulted in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiff. The case is here on the defendant’s exceptions.

The plaintiff’s claim was based on a chattel mortgage on a truck, which he said he was compelled to discharge to perfect his title. A principal issue was whether one Pratt, a minor, had dis-affirmed the mortgage. The first point briefed by the defendant is that the trial court should have granted the defendant’s motion for a'directed verdict because, to quote the heading of this portion of the brief,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Hardware Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1938
  2. Tinney v. CrosbySupreme Court of Vermont · 1941
  3. Hill v. StringerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1950
  4. Long v. LeonardSupreme Court of Vermont · 1943
  5. Town of Georgia v. Town of WatervilleSupreme Court of Vermont · 1935

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Jennifer Cushman v. Trans Union CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997
  2. Jolicoeur v. MihalyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Conley v. CrisafulliSupreme Court of Vermont · 2010
  4. LaPlante v. EastmanSupreme Court of Vermont · 1954
  5. Duval v. DuvalSupreme Court of Vermont · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API